Blinded by prejudice to the naked aggression of Israel

On Friday, incredibly, we were treated to Regev-style Ministry of Truth revisionism that purports to say that black is actually white, and vice versa. Wilcox seeks to portray the leaders of people living in the world’s largest open prison as “terrorists” – the same label used by the likes of the Syrian dictator al Assad and his sponsors to describe people wishing to free themselves from the yoke of al Assad’s murderous regime. As a term, it’s even more exhausted than “fake news”.
Wilcox says that Hamas attacked Israel with “bombs and fire”. (Being economical with the actuality as usual, JC.) Conversely, Israel has repeatedly used air-bursted White Phosphorus (WP) over defenceless Gazans, which constitutes a war crime by any known criteria. Check out what WP does to exposed human flesh. As Human Rights Watch, using bona fide authenticated data, explains in a 71-page report, the repeated use of air-burst white phosphorus artillery shells in populated areas of Gaza was not incidental or accidental, but revealed “a pattern or policy of conduct”. These are repeated, orchestrated act of naked aggression. 
I think it highly unlikely that Wilcox has ever been anywhere near a conflict zone, and completely relies on biased and questionable sources for his “information”. Gratuitously attacking the likes of Eric Bahrt from a position of relative ignorance does Wilcox a disservice, seeing as Eric clearly knows far more about the issues than he does and, if anything, occupies the moral high ground. 
But, and given the usual ethically offensive barrages and anti-Muslim ordure from Wilcox and his ilk, one should not expect anything else.
Dr Frank